We buy secondary shares in solid and profitable growth companies with a
clear path to exit within the next three years. Minority stakes, limited
involvement except exit advisory, tickets €100k–1M.
Soria Capital AS – Sustainability-related disclosures at entity level
pursuant to SFDR
Background
As an alternative investment fund manager, Soria Capital AS ("Soria") is
required under Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability-related
disclosures in the financial services sector (the "SFDR"), as implemented
in Norwegian law, to publish and maintain certain sustainability-related
disclosures on its website.
The paragraphs below provide information required under the SFDR about
Soria's policies on the integration of sustainability risks in its
investment decisions, whether principal adverse impacts of Soria's
investment decisions are considered and how Soria's remuneration policies
are consistent with the integration of sustainability risks.
Transparency of sustainability risk policies – SFDR article 3
SFDR article 3 requires fund managers such as Soria to publish on their
websites information about their policies on the integration of
sustainability risks in their investment decision-making process.
Sustainability risks are defined in the SFDR as environmental, social or
governance events or conditions that, if they occur, could cause an actual
or a potential material negative impact on the value of the investment.
Soria integrates sustainability risks in its ordinary assessment of risks
associated with a potential investment and the ongoing monitoring of the
portfolio. In practice, when reviewing a potential investment, Soria will
seek to identify environmental, social or governance matters that could
have a material negative impact on the value of the investment or on the
ability to realise an exit within the contemplated timeframe. This may,
for example, include matters relating to regulatory exposure, reputation,
employment conditions, corporate governance, or business practices that
may affect the company's attractiveness to a future buyer.
As a starting point, Soria does not give sustainability risk greater
weight than other risks of a similar nature and significance to the value
of the investment. A sustainability risk may, as any other financial risk,
be decisive in determining that an investment is not made, either on its
own or together with other risk factors, or it may be reflected in the
entry price or the terms Soria seeks to agree.
No consideration of principal adverse impacts – SFDR article 4
SFDR article 4 requires fund managers such as Soria to publish and
maintain on their websites information on whether they consider principal
adverse impacts (PAI) of investment decisions on sustainability factors
and, where they do not consider adverse impacts of investment decisions on
sustainability factors, clear reasons therefor, including, where relevant,
information as to whether and when they intend to do so. Sustainability
factors are environmental, social and employee matters, respect for human
rights, anti-corruption and anti-bribery matters, and PAI are the most
significant negative impacts of investment decisions on these factors.
Soria does not at this time consider adverse impacts of its investment
decisions on sustainability factors.
The reason for this is that Soria expects that obtaining and processing
the information necessary to make such assessments would require resources
which, in Soria's view, would be more beneficially allocated to other
purposes for the benefit of investors, in particular given (i) the absence
of any sustainability profile in the fund it manages and (ii) Soria's
limited size.
Soria keeps this assessment under review, but has not currently set a date
for beginning to consider PAI.
Transparency of remuneration policies in relation to the integration of
sustainability risks – SFDR article 5
SFDR article 5 requires fund managers such as Soria to publish on their
website information on how their remuneration policies are consistent with
the integration of sustainability risks.
Employees of Soria receive a fixed salary set by reference to their role,
responsibilities and market levels, and Soria does not pay bonuses or
other variable remuneration. Soria therefore considers that its
remuneration structure does not encourage risk-taking that is inconsistent
with the risk profile of the fund managed by Soria, including with respect
to sustainability risks, and that it is consistent with Soria's
integration of sustainability risks.
Certain employees may directly or indirectly participate in carried
interest in respect of the fund managed by Soria. Carried interest depends
on the realised, long-term performance of the fund as a whole. Since
sustainability risks form part of Soria's ordinary risk assessment on a
par with other financial risks, any sustainability risk that reduces the
value of an investment will also reduce carried interest. Such
participation does not, therefore, alter the assessment above.